Localization is one of the bigger time sinks in performance marketing. You launch a campaign in North America, it works, and now it needs to ship to fifteen markets with translated copy, localized cultural cues, and the right units (miles vs km, currency, regional spelling). Done by hand, it’s a multi-week project. Done on Melius, it’s a single brief.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.melius.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
The basic pattern
Open the canvas with your source ad
Either the original asset alone, or the full workflow that produced it. The workflow approach is faster if you’re localizing several variants — you’ll re-run the same workflow with localized prompts.
Group the source ad (and its inputs, if you're keeping the workflow)
Select everything you want localized, hit
Cmd+G to group.Let the agent generate
For each market, the agent creates a new variant. Translation runs through a language model; the localized text gets baked into the new generation.
What the agent handles automatically
The current Melius agent is sophisticated enough that for a well-known brand and market, you don’t need to spell out every localization rule. If you ask for “10 versions of this ad for different regions,” it knows:- To translate copy into the target language
- To switch units of measurement (miles ↔ km, °F ↔ °C, $ ↔ local currency)
- To swap region-specific cultural references (Thanksgiving → equivalent regional holidays where relevant)
- To pick imagery that fits — different model demographics, different settings, different aesthetic norms by region
A worked example
Brand: US-based fitness app. Source ad: static showing a runner with text “Track your miles” and a map of San Francisco. Target: ten markets, full localization. The brief to the agent:Working with brand-specific localization rules
Many brands have explicit localization guidelines — what to translate vs leave in English, which markets get full localization vs token translation, region-specific brand voice variants. Put these in your brand anchor:Sub-regional localization
Some markets are too varied to treat as one localization. The classic case: Miami and rural Texas are both “US,” but the audience, language register, and cultural cues are very different. Same for São Paulo vs Recife in Brazil, or Tokyo vs Osaka in Japan. If the spend justifies it, run sub-regional localization:Common pitfalls
- Trusting the translation 100%. Models are good, not perfect. For high-spend markets, native-speaker review is cheap insurance.
- Localizing copy but not imagery. Translation alone doesn’t make an ad feel local — the imagery has to land too. Lean on the agent to swap settings, models, and cultural cues, not just words.
- Ignoring sub-regional variation in big markets. US, Brazil, India, and a few other markets are too internally varied for a single localization to work everywhere.
- Hardcoding brand terms in the brand anchor without translation rules. Your brand anchor should explicitly say what translates and what doesn’t, or the model will guess.